CJ Spiller
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFcecMcS6bA
Sorry for the graphic issue. I'm sure it's temporary. So the Giant interest in Spiller has been leaked in a few articles. I actually think if he's not there at 15 we should trade down and get more picks. I'm not a big fan of McClain, and I think Iupati and Pouncy could still be there if we traded down a bit. Spiller is a special player. He's not a horse, but can handle 10-12 touches per game, and all your return needs. He's fast and elusive and can't be caught from behind like our other backs. I believe we will get a speed back in the draft, whether it's Spiller, Best, McCluster or McKnight. I think if Spiller is there, we have to take him. Go Giants.
posted by Kalel9 @ 12:17 PM
6 Comments:
If they do trade up for him it's a pretty clear indication that they have serious concerns about the health of Jacobs and Bradshaw.
He's different than either of them. They can both be everydown backs. CJ should be spotted. I think it would just mean they have a sky-high grade on him.
But they have so many other more pressing needs, particularly at LB.
I endorse drafting for BPA. Plus, our return games have been crap so fixing those is a big need.
I'm not gonna reach for mike in the first.
I definitely believe in BPA, but my point is about trading up or down in order to marry value with need.
If Spiller's not there, I'd trade down. Spiller's a top 10 prospect. I'm not taking McClain whose Crohn's disease kept him from finishing his workout.
Post a Comment
<< Home