Knicks D
One of the saddest things you can see on a basketball court is players willing to play defense, but stuck in a defense that doesn't work. That's basically what the Knicks have been doing the past few years. Unlike the Marbury Era, when no one was willing to play D, these Knicks have at least been willing. Unfortunately, the system, that required constant switching didn't work, and couldn't since teams could easily take advantage of that with back screens, etc.
Anyway, the news out of West Point yesterday was that the Knicks only worked on defense in their first practice, and it was a new and simpler D. Essentially, the Knicks will use their wings to funnel the ball to one side or another, instead of idiotically funneling the ball into the middle of the court. This can lead to real zone responsibilities without a ton of man/zone switching. This is pretty good news, because it should play into what the players can do, and have shown a willingness to do. This should be a welcome relief to Knicks fans.
4 Comments:
Beyond the schemes themselves, which obviously matter, so much of defense is about getting players to commit to the mindset, and at least for the foreseeable future, I am very confident that they will.
I don't think getting players to play D has been the problem it used to be, but I do think the players were suspicious of the old D.
It's amazing how Woody was touted as a defensive coach yet has never had a team ever finish top 10 in defensive efficiency. I think I saw a stat that he's one of 2 coaches who was a HC for 5+ years and never had a team finish top 10 in that category.
I've been saying this to a lot of people, the Knicks will benefit greatly simply by subtraction of Woody & Ray Felton. When you start factoring in the additions, like a competent coach and an actual PG, I have a strong feeling they are going to surprise A LOT of people.
Kalel9
The end result is the same though. They stop trusting teammates and stop communicating, which then feeds on itself.
Woody was the beneficiary of Kidd playing somewhat like his old self for a few months. As he declined, so did the entire team.
Tyson was a net negative too, and when you factor in the salary cap implications of his contract and the amnesty of Billups, a massively humongous negative.
Post a Comment
<< Home