Radulov?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/708ff/708ffba71b8bfa8fb7ece1a132eb0c80fc405029" alt=""
Now, the cost is the issue, it cannot possibly be too much because the Preds have little leverage. The Rangers would also have to give Radulov a new contract. So they'd have to pay twice, making it less likely that they will trade much. That is a far cry from what a Nash trade would still cost, and Radulov is not far behind Nash as a scorer. Sure, he doesn't look like a Torts type guy, but he'd immediately help the power play, and make us more consistently at 2 or three line team, depending on what else they do and how the kids develop.
The second thing Brooks said was that the Rangers need a D with a right shot and that Justin Schultz is their first choice for the role. I am massively down with that idea, so I hope it works out.
Then they'd still have cap room for another score or so, depending how creative they can get. And both moves Brooks is hawking seem like creative solutions for the Rangers needs. Go Rangers!
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home