Giants Draft: Moving Around
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f535/3f535438ad831b9f32b0434e0ead0c2b0f114034" alt=""
So, if the Giants want to trade up in the first, it would probably be way up and they'd have to use a package that would include this year's 1, Osi, and and probably someone else. I think it's highly unlikely that they trade up in the first, unless it's from 32-t0 31 or 30 with our 1 and 4. And really, since trading up for Eli, the last two trade ups that come to mind were for Sinorice Moss and Bryan Kehl. Moss was a disaster and left great value on the board and Kehl was allergic to contact. Oh, and he became a Redskin today! Haha!
I think it is almost more likely that the Giants trade out of the first. I think they should do this many years, and especially in drafts where they is a large red-chip area. This draft is like that. The 2005 and 2006 drafts were like that, and our 2005 draft with just 4 picks was remarkable. Webster, Tuck, Jacobs, then Eric Moore, who I think is still bouncing around the league. That was an incredible draft for the Giants. In 2006, they traded down then traded back up for Sinorice Moss, which was a rare and colossal error given what was left on the board.
So, I think they will listen to offers for their first, but if they decide to trade down, I hope they make the picks instead of trading them again.
Now trading up for a targeted player after the first seems easier and more likely since we have 2 fours. I've talked about moving up with our 2 and 4 to get Sanu, and I think something like that could happen.
Jerry really doesn't like to trade future picks, though there will be a sea of picks between our compensatory four and our 6th rounder, so who knows? Maybe they would try to make a move to get a pick in that area.
And there remains the possibility of trading Osi. But that would have to be for a 1 or a high 2 or is shouldn't be considered. I don't know if any other roster players are in play. If we get down to our 2nd rounder, I think we should assume that Osi is going nowhere.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home