A Month of Fundays

A New York Yankees, Giants, Knicks, Rangers and other stuff blog.


AdLeaf Free Advertising
Your Ad Here
Your Ad Here

Thursday, July 02, 2009

Not Kidding Around

The Knicks are apparently going to offe Jason Kidd a three year contract. It won't mess up their 2010 plan and may even help give them some credibility, but you have to wonder how much he has left. Well, let's hope playing for coach D'Antoni revitalizes him, cause it looks like he will be a Knick. In other possible Knick news, Dallas has offered Gortat the full MLE, so that means he's probably not bound for Houston. What does that mean for us? It means we may be able to trade Curry and stuff to the Rockets for an expiring like Tracy McGrady. Go Knicks!

UPDATE: Jason Kidd has told the Knicks that he will take the weekend to decide whether or not to join them or stay with Dallas next year. In other news, the Knicks have no interest in doing a sign and trade with Torontor for David Lee unless Chrish Bosh is coming back. What's more, Walsh said he has some leeway for next year, which leads me to believe he has found a taker for Curry or Jeffries. It's possible Curry could be going to Houston or JJ could be involved in some sign and trade Walsh has in his back pocket. It will be interesting to see. Once we dump either of those deals, we are set.

6 Comments:

At 6:52 PM, Blogger Michael said...

Gortat has given Dallas a verbal commitment he will sign an offer sheet, so either way very good news for us possibly shipping Curry to Houston.

 
At 12:02 PM, Blogger Michael said...

hoopsworld says Kidd is staying in Dallas

 
At 12:02 PM, Blogger Kalel9 said...

That's fine, too.

 
At 12:06 PM, Blogger Michael said...

I prefer Nash anyhow, and think we have a good chance on him.

 
At 12:07 PM, Blogger Kalel9 said...

So do I. I'm interest to see if we have a trade for Jeffries, and it looks like Lee will stay.

 
At 12:12 PM, Blogger Michael said...

Donnie's comments surely indicate that he has something up his sleeve. Hahn has been tweeting that it wont take Curry to get T-Mac, but my ? is why would we hold him? If we got Nash and T-Mac that would certainly be much more enticing to the King.

I think Nate is a goner also, possibly w Jefferies to Sacramento as we had talked about at the deadline?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home